I’ve about had it with the uber-liberal hyper-Hillary machine taking and twisting every single thing that comes out of Donald Trump’s mouth as some sort of inane banter set to wreak havoc on the world. It’s so blatantly obvious that the media is rooting for Hillary that they aren’t even trying to cover it up… so let’s go back and compare something, shall we?
Trump got in trouble because at a campaign stop, while he was blasting Hillary (it’s what both candidates do this election cycle!), he made mention that the “2nd Amendment people would take care of Hillary.” Now, does that sound like it’s a veiled threat to assassinate Hillary? Or does it sound like the folks that believe in the 2nd Amendment would come together and defeat Hillary at the polls? Now before you answer, let’s take a look at another quote: “My husband did not wrap up the nomination in 1992 until he won the California primary somewhere in the middle of June, right? We all remember Bobby Kennedy was assassinated in June in California. I don’t understand it,” she said, dismissing calls to drop out.
So, that was from a speech Hillary Clinton gave in 2008 when the world was telling her (much like it told Bernie Sanders) to drop out of the race and let Bobo Obama have the nomination. She refused saying that Bill didn’t wrap up the nomination until California…so why in hell would she even think of bringing up Bobby Kennedy’s assassination? Yes it happened in California, it happened 24 years before Bill ran…and 40 years before she ran. It had nothing to do with what she was saying. The only possible explanation you can read into this quote from Hillary is that “hey, Bobby Kennedy got assassinated there, Obama may too!”
There is no other plausible explanation, and it’s certainly a LOT more feasible than what Trump was saying about 2nd Amendment “people”. It’s just one more example of what Clinton is trying to do. She’s ripping a page out of Obama’s 2012 playbook. When Mitt Romney had the election in the bag because Obama had sucked at being president so badly in his first four years, it was Obama’s strategy to talk about anything except the issues because he knew he couldn’t win on the issues. Well, Hillary is doing the same thing. She knows, being tied to Bobo so tightly that if this campaign is about the issues, she loses…hands down. So, she has to make it about Trump. It’s got to be a referendum on Donald Trump, and how much of an ogre-asshole he is. If she’s successful at doing that, then she can possibly skate on the issues.
Of course, Trump is doing the same thing on Hillary. He’s trying to create this character that is “crooked Hillary”. Is all of what either candidate saying true? Nope…but it WOULD be nice to base this election on the issues. We know Hillary is a pathological liar and unstable. We know Donald is egomaniacal and loose with his words. What we WANT is to know where the candidates stand on the issues. Are we going to get it? Doubtful…
Carry on world…you’re dismissed!