The Dead Really DO Vote In Chicago!

The CBS affiliate, Channel 2, WBBM, has come out with an investigative report. Now, I know everybody is extremely “pro-Chicago” these days with the Cubs and all, but we all know that’s not really what Chicago is known for. It’s a lot better known for Al Capone, Richard Daily, drive-by shootings, and the dead voting. And apparently, all of that is true.

WBBM came out with a report recently showing that, Yes, Virginia, dead people really DO vote in Chicago. They showed instances where someone that died in 1998 voted in the 2010 off-year election. Someone else that died in 1994 has voted six times since then…and it’s always for Democrats! Imagine that.

Now, Chicagoans aren’t going to bitch and complain about this, hell they are 90% Democrat. And that is exactly the reason why the city is in the trouble it’s in! There isn’t a prosperous city that’s been run by Democrats for 50 years in this country. They are ALL in decline. Because liberalism doesn’t work. It can’t because sooner or later you run out of Other People’s Money.

So, what’s all of this mean in terms of the presidential election? It means that of course Hillary Clinton is going to take Illinois! She has to because 25% of the votes coming out of there are going to be from the dearly departed. And it’s the very reason why Democrats are pushing to allow illegal aliens (that is defined as people that have come into this country illegally are NOT citizens of this country) the right to vote in presidential elections. Am I missing something here?

Do I have the right to travel 2 1/2 hours south to Nogales, Mexico and vote in their presidential elections? Do the people back in Toledo, Ohio where I’m from have the right to travel an hour north to Windsor, Ontario Canada and vote in their provincial elections? Nope. So can anybody tell me why in the name of John Myatt we should be allowing people that aren’t citizens of our country, much less came here and crossed the border illegally the right to vote? I’m waiting to hear the answer to that one. It’s gotta be a hoot!

No, illegals shouldn’t be here and they certainly shouldn’t be voting. I’ve said all along that if they came here illegally, and they want to stay, as long as they have a clean record, pay taxes, back taxes, and a penalty, I’m all for it. I’m NOT however for making them a citizen ahead of the people that are going about it legally. And if they DO ever become a citizen, they never, EVER get the right to vote in any election. That is stamped on their state ID or drivers’ license. And in an election that apparently is going to be as close as this one is, they certainly shouldn’t be deciding it. And neither should dead people!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!


What The Democrats SHOULD Do

Let’s get one thing clear up top. I’m not a fan of convicting someone before they are convicted. But in a case where there is such a mountain of evidence and no plausible excuse as to why that evidence exists without guilt being associated, one’s mind has to go there (at least if they’re not totally mind-numbed robots of the side that’s being accused). But it’s with that in mind that I bring you exactly the best way for the Democrats to save their hides in this election season.

It’s become very clear and very evident over the past 19 months that Hillary Clinton is a liar. She’s been called that to her face and she has never denied it. She can’t. The facts are the facts. Now, FBI Director James Comey has to have come up with something that is a bombshell revelation that he didn’t have last month when he told the world that a prosecutor couldn’t try Hillary Clinton because “there was no intent”. Apparently, he has found that intent. Otherwise, why would he bring that up? We have to leave out one thing I know my liberal friends would love to pounce on here, and that’s that he didn’t actually do it for political purposes. That so far in his career has not been Comey’s motivation, and there is nothing to suggest here that it is his motivation. So, with that in mind, if you are Donna Brazile, head of the DNC, what is the best thing for you to do for your party?

You have to throw your candidate under the bus. Oh, it’s been done at the VP level before. Remember Thomas Eagleton? He was the Vice Presidential pick of George McGovern, and when it was found out that he had been seeing a shrink, McGovern dropped him from the ticket like a hot potato. Not that McGovern was going to beat Nixon anyway. This was 1972, and Watergate hadn’t really erupted yet. Oh, we knew about it…but Nixon was playing Hillary and was denying everything. But changing out a candidate HAS been done, just not at the very top of the ticket. So, Donna Brazile, if she really wants the chance to show the country she has the country’s best interests at heart, and not Hillary’s, she needs to throw Hillary under the bus, and bring someone else in. Will they lose the presidency? Yup. They sure will. Are they going to now? Well, I still don’t have a working crystal ball (and neither does anybody else), but the odds are growing in Trump’s favor!

What I would do if I were a much better looking Donna Brazile is to announce to the world that Hillary Clinton was being taken off the ticket and all votes for the Democrats for president would not count. But I would at the same time encourage all of America to vote downstream and elect a Democrat to a House of Representatives seat, or a Senate seat. The Dems have their eyes fixated on taking back the Senate, and they had talked earlier about the House (though that seems like a pipe-dream now!). But if Brazile were to say that they’d concede the presidential race to Trump, but we NEED to have a Democrat controlled congress to temper all of the negativity that Trump is going to try and throw at the country, the chances would be at least 50/50 that she could swing enough votes in enough close races to get that done. Then in 2020, get a REAL Democrat candidate to run that isn’t going to tank your party with their crimes and their lies and let them go after it.

It’s a simple strategy that would work! The only thing standing in the way is that Democrats usually don’t react like that. Oh, they did in Anthony Weiner’s case after the sexting scandals got to be even too much for them…but overall, they circle the wagons and ride out the attack. That isn’t going to do them any favors this time around. Hillary has hurt this party a lot with the latest revelations, and isn’t going to help them win either chamber of congress if she stays in the race. It’s time to cut the losses and see what else you can go after. IF they were smart…which they’re not.

That by the way, is free advice. Use it Donna, or you’re going to end up like Little Debbie!

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Why Hillary’s Supporters Stay With Her

It hit me about three o’clock this morning exactly why Democrats still want Hillary Clinton to be president despite countless scandals, foibles, lies, and illegal activities. It’s because they don’t view the world like “normal” people do. Let me explain.

Most normal people view right and wrong. They view it as following the rules or breaking the rules. They don’t view it as a sliding scale. You are either right, or you are wrong. You are either breaking the law or you are following the law. There is no in-between. That’s not the case with liberals. Liberals need to have sliding scales for everything. There HAS to be a lot of grey area because they need to excuse so much amoral, unethical, illegal, and just plain wrong behavior, so they have developed this “grey area” scale. Let’s look at that shall we?

Take a look at the constitution. Now, conservatives will tell you that it says that you have a freedom of speech. You have the freedom to worship as you choose without governmental interference. You have the right to own a firearm. But that is too cut and dried for a liberal. They don’t want to see it that way because it flies in the face of what they believe. They don’t believe you necessarily have the right to say anything against their ideology (go back to the Alien & Sedition act on that one!). They believe that freedom OF religion (what it says) should be freedom FROM religion, and thus a separation between religion and government (their religion). And, they don’t believe you necessarily have the right to bear arms, but you have the right to form a well-organized militia and that individuals shouldn’t be allowed to carry weapons like that. So, in order to make all of that “grey area” stuff sound normal, they call the constitution “a living, breathing document”. Well, it’s neither frankly. It’s not alive, and never has been, and it doesn’t breathe. I’ve seen it. It lays there in the National Archives. That’s all it does. But if you take it at its face value, liberals are wrong, and they can’t have that.

Let’s take a look at another area. Let’s look at the law. You have prosecutors, and you have defense attorneys. The defense folks are about 99.9% liberal. Why? Because quite honestly, it’s their job to convince judges and juries that their clients are the victims, not the perpetrators of crimes. It’s no longer did they do it, but WHY they did it. And the excuses range from they ate too many Twinkies as a kid (as in the Harvey Milk murder case), to their parents didn’t love them enough, to they were too rich, or too poor, or too smart, or too stupid. The defense likes to come up with any excuse to make the accused become the victim. And what’s wrong with that? Well, it takes the guilty or not guilty and throws it out the window, replacing it with a sliding scale of guilt. They may be guilty, but it wasn’t their fault. Nothing is EVER their fault.

And so it is with Hillary Clinton. Yes, she had an illegal server in her basement, but it wasn’t her fault. She was only thinking of convenience. Yes, Bill Clinton met with Loretta Lynch in an airplane in Phoenix before the DOJ decided not to indict Hillary, but it wasn’t his fault. He was only talking about grandchildren. Yes, Hillary met with the elections official in Broward Country, Florida two weeks before a very contested election, but it was only to share yoga routines. Same thing…the truth is a sliding scale based on whatever liberals need it to say. And that my friends is a very dangerous thing, because I too can manipulate the truth to say what I want it to say, and I would just bet you I’m better at manipulating the truth having been a talk show host, than about 99% of you! So be careful…and…

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Does The FBI Re-Investigation Mean Anything….REALLY?

It was most assuredly a major surprise when James Comey stood at a podium on Friday and announced that the FBI was going to re-open the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandals. Republicans felt vindicated and Democrats felt betrayed. Of course, that’s like saying the sun is going to rise in the east in the morning. The mere fact Comey did it isn’t the big news here. You have to dig deeper to find it. Let’s do that shall we?

First of all, yes, Republicans feel this could be the October Surprise game changer they’ve been looking for, and it may be. That part I’m not sure of. This election has been so filled with innuendo and mudslinging that both candidates look like they belong in the mud-wrestling scene of Stripes. And it hasn’t seem to dampen the enthusiasm all that much on either side. Has Trump lied? Probably, yes. Has Hillary lied? See the above question about the sun rising in the east. Does it matter? That is the real question!

I’m sure for someone that has been sitting on the fence, not sure IF they were going to vote, they may be persuaded to go to the polls and vote for Trump just because it looks like Clinton WAS guilty of something. That will be the takeaway on this. Why open the case if there isn’t something there? Of course, Democrats are going to swing at Comey, wondering why someone that is supposedly conservative would wait until 11 days before an election to bring this forward. And Republicans are happy just because it gets the news off of Trump (who actually broke it to a crowd at his rally) and gives him more ammunition.

But does this news really matter? I would say no. There’s no way you are going to get anything definitive out of the FBI between now and Election Day. And let’s be real honest here. The whole investigation can be quelled by Obama with one swipe of the pen if he were to pardon Clinton for “crimes that may have been committed up to this point”. Of course, he taints his whole presidency much more than it already is if he does that (ask Gerald Ford!). But if she wins, it isn’t going to matter, other than to have happen what I said over a year ago…Hillary Clinton would win the election and by February would be impeached and this time would become the first person every convicted of a crime and forced to leave office.

Now, again, will it matter in the election? Probably not. If you’re a Clintonista, you’re angry. You’re angry at the FBI Director for waiting to bring this out a handful of days prior to an election that was going your way. If you’re a Trump supporter, you’re more of a Trump supporter. And if by chance you are one of the six people sitting on the sidelines not voting, I doubt this is going to move a lot of you. It may move some, but enough to tilt the election? Let’s face it…Trump needs you to be in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Iowa, Texas, Arizona, Colorado, Virginia, New Hampshire, or Nevada to make a difference, assuming he’s going to hang on to Florida. IF he can sway enough people in those ten states it matters, yes, it can make a difference. We’ll find out a week from Tuesday, won’t we?

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Yeah…Another One I Didn’t Write…

But I gotta tell you…it makes all the sense in the world! There really ARE some smart people out there! This one was written by a law student.

*Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives,
socialists, Marxists and Obama supporters, et al:*
*We have stuck together since the late 1950’s for the*
*sake of the kids, but the whole of this latest election
process has made me realize that I want a divorce.*
*I know we tolerated each other for many years for the
sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has
clearly run its course.*

*Our two ideological sides of America cannot and will not ever
agree on what is right for us all, so let’s just end it on
friendly terms. We can smile and chalk it up to
irreconcilable differences and go our own way.*

*Here is our separation agreement:*

*–Our two groups can equitably divide up the country
by landmass each taking a similar portion. That will be the
difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a
friendly agreement. After that, it should be relatively easy!
Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other
assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes.*

*–We don’t like re-distributive taxes so you can keep
*–You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU.*
*–Since you hate guns and war, we’ll take our firearms, the cops, the
NRA, and the military.*
*–We’ll take the nasty, smelly oil industry and the coal
mines, and you can go with wind, solar and bio-diesel.*
*–You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore and Rosie O’Donnell.
You are, however, responsible for finding a bio-diesel
vehicle big enough to move all three of them.*
*–We’ll keep capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical
companies, Wal-Mart and Wall Street.*
*–You can have your beloved lifelong welfare dwellers,
food stamps, hippies, druggies and illegal aliens**.*
*–We’ll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms,
*greedy CEOs, and rednecks.*
*–We’ll keep Bill O’Reilly and Bibles, and give you*
*NBC and Hollywood.*
*–You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and*
*we’ll retain the right to invade and hammer places*
*that threaten us.*
*–You can have the peaceniks and war protesters.*
*–**When our allies or our way of life are under assault, we’ll help
provide them security.*
*–We’ll keep our Judeo-Christian values.*
*–You are welcome to Islam, Scientology, Humanism, political
correctness and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N.
but we will no longer be paying the bill.*
*–We’ll keep the SUV’s, pickup trucks and oversized
luxury cars. You can take every Volt Tesla and Leaf you can
*–You can give everyone healthcare if you can find*
*any practicing doctors.*
*–We’ll keep “The Battle Hymn of the Republic”*
*and* “The National Anthem.”*
*–I’m sure you’ll be happy to substitute “Imagine,”*
*”I’d Like to Teach the World to Sing,” “Kumbaya,”*
*or “We Are the World.”*
*–We’ll practice trickle-down economics and you can continue
to give trickle up poverty your best shot.*
*–Since it often so offends you, we’ll keep our history,*
*our name and our flag.*
*Would you agree to this? If so, please pass it along to other
like-minded liberal and conservative patriots and if you do
not agree, just hit delete. In the spirit of friendly
parting, I’ll bet you might think about which one of us will
need whose help in 15 years**.*

*P.S. Also, please take Ted Turner, Sean Penn, Martin & Charlie
Sheen, George Clooney, Barbara Streisand, and (Hanoi) Jane
Fonda with you.**.*

I did not write this, but I sure like the message!

OK…I NEVER repost blogs on my site. It’s just something I’ve chosen not to do. Today, I am. Once you read this, you will know why!

Basharr's Outpost

From Kathy Simpson….”I was asked tonight how I could ever support Trump after the comments he made over 11 years ago about women and if I would still support him if he made those comments to my daughter? My response was this….If he had put our nations security at risk, I would not vote for him. If his organization received large donations from countries that killed women and gays, I would not vote for him. If he boasted 30 Years of government experience, but still could not discern if an email was classified or not, without someone letting him know if it was or not, I would not vote for him. If he boasted about how he has defended children his entire life, but is for abortion, (even late term, when the child can feel pain) I would not vote for him. If he wanted my 3 year old Granddaughter…

View original post 223 more words

Trump Is Right…Hillary Shouldn’t Be Allowed To Run

The following is US Code Title 18-2071:
(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

Donald Trump has said on the stump that Hillary Clinton shouldn’t be allowed to run for office because of her actions. And I thought for the longest time that was just campaign blather. God knows we’ve heard enough of it, right? So, I was amazed to see on CNN of all places that he is actually right! Title 18 of the US Code, section 2071 states very clearly that any person that does what Hillary has said she did, what the FBI said she did “shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.” That would include holding the office of president.

That section right there will be the one to come back and bite Hillary in the ass should a) she win the election next Tuesday and b) she not be pardoned by Barack Obama before she takes office. If either a) or b) are wrong, then the whole scenario I’m about to describe goes away.

IF Clinton wins the election, the Republicans in congress will, upon her inauguration, move to have her impeached based on 2071 of Title 18. Because she has concealed, removed, falsified, and destroyed documents pertaining to the United States government. And I think she has said she has willfully done so with the 30,000 emails she claimed on March 10, 2015 were “yoga routines and emails about Chelsea’s wedding”. When you look at this thing on the surface, it’s abundantly clear, there is no other option. She can be fined, and actually imprisoned if found guilty for up to three years, and more importantly, she forfeits her office, AND can never hold office again.

THAT will fall in line with exactly what I said eight months ago when I said Hillary would win the White House and be out of the White House by April! That is the mechanism of how the GOP could do such a thing.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!