Huma On The Hot Seat

While the FBI continues their investigation into Hillary Clinton’s illegal and unethical use of her private home-brew email server to evade governmental scrutiny, her aide, Huma Abedin apparently has just about had enough with her boss. Huma had to be deposed by Judicial Watch in their lawsuit against Hillary and the State Department for failure to turn over the documents that had been properly requested through a FOIA request (Freedom of Information Act request).

There were about 250 additional emails that Huma had to bare to the world, some of which were complaining that Hillary was always “exhausted” when she had to go on her trips, and Huma was getting tired of hearing about it all the time. Illegal? Nope, not that. But there was enough damning evidence that came out that suggests that Hillary committed perjury back in 2009, when she left office and swore under penalty of such, that she had turned over all relevant documents to the State Department and that she kept nothing of a business nature. Of course, we all know now, that was a steaming pile of dog poop. And I don’t think it even surprises the most staunch liberal that Hillary Clinton has lied her way through this investigation. The funny thing here is that most staunch liberals don’t seem to care that she lied. Obviously, character doesn’t matter at all to them, only when Donald Trump is involved!

The evidence becomes more damning when it was revealed that a Romanian hacker in jail in this country swears that HE was able to break into Hillary’s private email system and said it was very easy to do. The mere fact he went in and rooted around a private server is bad enough, but what’s really the bad news for Hillary is that the hack known as “Guccifer” said he found evidence there had been up to ten different OTHER hackers from around the world looking in her system. Of course, Hillary immediately came out and denied anybody could have gotten into her system…it was entirely secure. And we believe her, right?

The very disturbing thing here is the mixed messages we seem to be hearing from Washington. On one hand, we are hearing about how the FBI is almost ready to wrap up its investigation and that its found multiple reasons to indict. On the other, we are hearing the DOJ is doing “research” on how to not indict its presidential candidate just months before an election. It comes down to one thing. IF Hillary receives not an indictment, but a referral from the FBI, my hunch is that will be enough to scare off some Democrats, most Independents, and all Republicans from voting for her. Donald Trump becomes a lot more presidential at that point.

Either way, this much I can unequivocally say: Regardless who you are leaning toward as far as president next year, you’re probably going to have to vote with one hand, and hold your nose with the other. This is definitely one of those elections that we are electing the lesser of two evils.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!


More Email Problems…

Trust me…I don’t feel the least bit sorry for Hillary Clinton, but her email scandals just keep compounding. Now, it won’t matter a whit when it comes to the Democrats and their nomination. They don’t see the email scandal as anything more than a “vast right-wing conspiracy”. But when she gets to the general election in November it’s going to be devastating.

The latest bomb to explode inside the Clinton campaign came on Tuesday. A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Clinton’s top aides, Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills should be questioned under oath about her use of a private email server. This raises huge questions about the whole legality of the matter and is potentially a devastating blow to her campaign…even though she shrugs it off as “a security check”.

The judge, who isn’t some right-wing ideologue, but rather was appoint by…wait for it….wait for it…Bill Clinton of all people, said that the drip, drip, drip of constant information that comes out about Hillary’s scandal is “raising suspicions” of a vast Hillary conspiracy to break the law. The suit was filed in Federal Court by Judicial Watch, and yes, they ARE a right-wing group…but they’ve been getting a lot of press lately because they go out and file FOIA requests (Freedom Of Information Act) and file lawsuits. They’ve been very successful in the last few years and looks like they are getting their way again. The court has set a mid-April date to continue with the trial, just as Hillary is expected to complete her delegate totals in excess of the number needed to secure the nomination. Is that going to have an impact on the entire Democrat convention in Philadelphia?

Frankly, I’m not sure that it is. Democrats have been pooh-poohing this entire process with the emails and the lying and the untrustworthiness issue for months. They say they don’t care that Hillary is not trustworthy. They say they don’t care if she lies. Bernie Sanders beats her by 70-90% in those two categories in every single state. It doesn’t seem to matter to the Democrats. Somehow I think it will when it comes election time in November. I can’t imagine that a country is going to elect someone as president who has such a hard time finding where the truth is in a topic. She lied to the public and she’s lied to Scott Pelley on CBS during an interview when she was asked if she ever lied to the public. Oh, by the way Hillary, the answer to the question, “Have you ever lied to the American public?” isn’t, “I’ve never tried to”. It’s “NO!” That’s the answer America was looking for.

Look, this whole episode won’t mean a hill of beans because once again, the Democrats are proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that the truth doesn’t matter, only politics matters. The ends justifies the means regardless what it takes to get there. And with so much riding on this year’s presidential campaign, expect the dirty tricks, the voter fraud, the dead voters to come to the forefront once again. Truth doesn’t matter in the Democrat party. Only a win.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

NOW You’ve Done It!

How many times have you heard that? Time and again, I’ve heard that throughout my life…and usually, the speaker was right. But this time, I’m not the one they’re talking to. They’re talking to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The weather dudes and dudettes have screwed up big time this time.

We all know that NOAA has been screwing with the temperature data for years, trying to convince us that we’re in the midst of this hoax called “climate change”, right? I mean, they’ve been found with their fingers in the cookie dough, and now it’s time to pay the piper (another mixed metaphor). This time it’s Judicial Watch who is actually suing NOAA to gain access to raw data. What’s happened is Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with NOAA to gain access to their data from the end of October, 2014 to the end of October, 2015. NOAA failed to respond to the request thinking that if they ignored it, like a quick rain shower, it would go away. Unfortunately, they didn’t realize they were dealing with the pit-bulls of FOIA requests. When Judicial Watch doesn’t get what they want, they have an army of attorneys that know how to get it through other means. That means law suit. And usually it leads to them getting what they want (you’d figure the government would learn that one by now!)

According to the Judicial Watch website, here is what they are looking for:
The methodology and utilization of night marine air temperatures to adjust ship and buoy temperature data;
The use of other global temperature datasets for both NOAA’s in-house dataset improvements and monthly press releases conveying information to the public about global temperatures;
The utilization and consideration of satellite bulk atmospheric temperature readings for use in global temperature datasets; and
A subpoena issued for the aforementioned information by Congressman Lamar Smith on October 13, 2015.

OK, so why is this such a big deal? Well, because the US Government based on the Paris accord that was just signed by John Kerry and Bobo Obama, is about to spend billions of your tax dollars trying to defeat Mother Nature’s will, without any real data that man is causing any real harm. That’s because NOAA, whose job it is to collect environmental data, has been lying to the rest of the world on the data they’ve been collecting. They’ve been fudging the numbers. That, by the way, isn’t an accusation. That has been proven as fact. So in essence, what Judicial Watch is doing is going after NOAA because they no longer have any credibility, at least they won’t when JW is done with them. They are about to be exposed to the core as a group of eco-terrorists following the blindly led direction of Bobo Obama and Al Gore.

Just the mere fact that we’re heading down that path should send off alarm bells. But in the overall scheme of things, with “climate change” rated #6 on the list of hot topics this election season with only 5% of the people concerned with it, it probably won’t be on many people’s radar. But exposing NOAA to the blatant lies that it has been proven to be making IS important. That needs to be exposed, and the people that are involved need to be fired and never work in the industry again. What will they do? Well, there ARE a few bridges out here in the desert that don’t have panhandlers working the streets. They could try that. I understand the hours are long, but the pay isn’t bad. Those people make upwards of $50,000 a year (and its tax free!).

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Is He Worth $70 Million?

I will be the first to say that when you’re elected president of the United States, you are afforded a lot of perks that the rest of us will never get. A really neat tricked out 747 jet that is at the ready 24/7 for your use (and you don’t even have to pay for it, or go through security!). You get to travel the world at your will. You can also take lavish vacations for yourself and your family…not even together if you choose not to be with them.

But $70 million for vacations is a bit extravagant in my world. I’m sorry, but Bobo Obama just isn’t worth $70 mil. That’s the price tag that Judicial Watch has put on all of the Obama vacations (and his family) over the past seven years. This year alone the price tag will reach $11 million. Yes, there have been numerous golfing vacations in the warm-weather states. There has been the ski trip to Aspen for Michelle my belle, to try and get some exercise and get that “junk in the trunk” hidden a little bit.

There are always the junkets to the far-away lands in Africa, and Europe, and Asia. Chalk those up as education for the girls, as well as their best friends, so-so friends, and tag alongs. And of course, Christmas in Hawaii isn’t cheap for anybody. Especially if you do it like Bobo does it.

The question I pose to you is has he earned it? Is he worth it? My first answer is no. I don’t think he’s worth a $70 million investment in vacations at our expense. I am fully aware that a lot of that goes to security, and yes, you’ve got to take the presidential limousine with you wherever you go (nicknamed The Beast because of its massive weight). And you’ve got to ferry around helicopters, and navy jets, and all of the accoutrements that are necessary for security. I get that. But to spend $70 million? Yeah, that’s over-reaching it a bit, wouldn’t you agree? Especially if you were to tie it to job performance. I mean, for cryin’ out loud, Jimmy Carter never spent that much, and he was a better president that Obama! And you can’t even begin to compare George W. Bush to this guy…Bush blows him away on all accounts, and yes…the debate is over, and the science is settled on that one. No arguments accepted there!

There has to be a better way. I say, we already have a get-away location for our presidents to visit whenever they want, and they don’t have to take Air Force One. It’s called Camp David. It’s a 40 minute helicopter ride from the White House. You jump on Marine One, and before the Nightly News Hour on PBS is over, you’re there. Any other vacation a president wants to take should be fine, and they should be presented a bill when they come back home for the cost. The WHOLE cost, not just what the military says it would cost if they flew the family on Southwest on the “Wanna Get Away” fares.

Oh…by the way…I’d say the same if Bobo was a Republican. Sorry guys…$70 mil is too much for vacation expenses.

Carry on world…you’re dismissed!

Obama To Be DEPORTED????

I don’t think there are many people, Democrats included that will stand behind the presidency of Barack Obama. Not many will say that his policies, his leadership, and his skills as commander in chief have warranted him “Top Ten” status in the list of presidents. And even while there had been talk this past summer of impeachment, I don’t think, nor did I ever think it was a prudent move. So, if we’re not going to impeach the guy for being a total incompetent when it comes to his job, how do we get rid of him?

Well, if you’re Mitt Romney, speaking in Michigan for US Senate Candidate Terri Lynn Land, you say that Obama needs to apologize to the American people. That’s a very interesting thought. After all, he began this abortion called a presidency by traveling the world apologizing to everyone and anyone that would listen to him. Ah, but that’s not good enough to cut the cake. If you’re really pissed at the guy, and you really don’t want him doing any further damage in office, and you really want to kick Hillary in the stomach at the same time, what can you do? Impeachment isn’t politically the thing that’s going to work unless he’s really REALLY gone over the top. He’s just proven he’s incompetent…not malicious. Well, maybe a little malicious. But impeachment isn’t it.

Turn to Larry Klayman. Who in the hell is Larry Klayman you ask? He’s the guy that is a former Justice Department lawyer. He’s the guy that founded Judicial Watch, which by the way, they’re they people that were able to get all of the information on Benghazi that the House Oversight Committee couldn’t get. He’s sued to get Obama’s birth certificate. Now he’s suing Obama again. This time, he wants Obama deported.  You read right…that wasn’t a typo. Larry Klayman, founder of Judicial Watch, wants to deport the president of the United States.

So, what’s the reason Larry Klayman wants Obama deported? He falsified birth certificate documents, and other documents to falsely obtain a US passport. That’s a federal crime by the way. Of course, a president of the United States can’t be arrested for any crime while in office. He has to be impeached first. But there’s nothing in the law anywhere that says he can’t be deported. That’s probably because it’s also a law that says a president of the United States has to be a citizen of the United States, which makes deportation impossible by definition. Unless, you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he’s not a US citizen.

And just whom do you file said motions with? I mean after all, the Justice Department is under Bobo’s purview. Well, Klayman followed the rules. He has filed with Department of Homeland Security, ICE (the customs and immigration folks), and Office of Fraud and Detection at DHS. This according to WND’s website.

The document also states that Obama’s name isn’t officially Obama’s name. Apparently it’s Barry Soetoro. It was changed in Indonesia, and never changed back to Barrack Obama. The petition is 20 pages long. The following was taken from the petition, and is listed on the WND website:

A young woman giving birth in a foreign country to a child whose father was not an American citizen (and was himself deported) did not have the legal capacity to pass along American citizenship to such child, a report for the Western Journalism Center confirmed.

“When enacted in 1952, section 301 (of federal immigration laws at the time) required a U.S. citizen married to an alien to have been physically present in the United States for 10 years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The 10-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986, and still is applicable to persons born during that period,” the Western Journalism Center’s report explained.

Ann Dunham was only 18 years old upon Barack Hussian Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961. Her own date of birth in Wichita, Kansas, was November 29, 1942. She turned 14 on November 29, 1956. Therefore in contrast to the law’s requirement, she had lived only 4 1/2 years from her 14th birthday up until Barack Hussein Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961 – and apparently not all of those years actually within the United States.

Thus because of the requirement to reside in the United States continuously for five years after becoming 14 and a total of 10 years in the United States overall, Barack Hussein Obama could not acquire U.S. citizenship through his mother Ann Dunham. At the very least, he would have had to apply at some point for naturalization.

Is it going to happen? I’d say probably not. It’s just one more scar on an already battered president’s face.
Carry on world…you’re dismissed!